Chapter Nine - Policies, Procedures and Contracts
Summary
In this chapter, the author discusses the need for schools to create rules (policies) for use of technology. The author explains that acceptable use policies (AUPs) are legal contracts that are binding between the school and the members of the school community. The contracts can be changed to suit the needs of the members of the community when needed. The chapter also discusses the research and evaluation steps and tools that administrators need to use when creating contracts related to the use of technology.
Reaction
I think that it is very important for school administrators too carefully craft any type of policy that is binding on so many people. I also think that schools should be extremely careful when crafting "zero tolerance" policies. While the examples given related to technology and the use of cell phones, etc., there are many other "zero tolerance" policies that are exercised without much thought or common sense. As an example, I recently read in the news that a 7 year old child was suspended from school for throwing an imaginary "grenade" at an imaginary "box" that was full of "super villains" while on the playground. Due to the school's "zero tolerance" policy when it comes to weapons, the child was suspended. I read that he stated he did not understand why he was "dispended." I think this decision by the school is careless and is an example of an "all or nothing" approach that does not fit the needs of the community. The author brought up the issue cell phones and how some students are given permission to use cell phones to be able to speak with parents who are in the military deployed overseas. I think the decision to amend the "zero cell phone use" policy was correct in this case.
This chapter was very interesting to me. I agree that the 7 yr old probably should not be suspended. With that said, I have a lot of lawyer friends/family so I also understand you can't change the rule for the one kid. It would come back and bite you with the crazy parent of a 16 yr old who definitely knew what he was doing. It is definitively an annoying and sticky situation. It is really frustrating to me as well.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with you on the no cell phone use. No means no. So if the parent is in jail or overseas he/she needs to call the office and ask to speak to their child. That is just my opinion, though.